Monday, 21 January 2013

Hat Red


Hello deers.



I just thought I’d come along and say ‘Hi’ – just for a chat, I have nothing mind-blowing to communicate.

So – things I have been thinking about ~

Over the weekend I was reading articles in a recentish copy of Permaculture magazine.  I’m interested – always and very – in Mark Boyle and his challenge to live without money (Permaculture ran a feature article), but I just can’t see how it works.  It seems to me that he consistently fails to factor in that he is fit, strong, young and male.

The things he focuses on – walking not cars, foraging and scavenging, collecting rainwater and firewood, improvising shelters, showers and stoves, having ceilidhs and parties – I think these are the easy things.  They are counter-culture and require a bit of nouse (familiar word to you?  Yorkshire. Basically means common sense and initiative.  Said ‘now-se’ not ‘noose’), but they are not the real challenges.

After everyone had gone to bed, Hebe and I sat by the fire chatting.  Someone at the masonry had told her that in Greece and Spain they are in dire straits – not enough resources for hospitals to function and medical care to be given.  Her friend said in another year we could expect the same here, if the economic trends continue.  So we talked a long while about living without money and meeting adversity – what we thought we realistically could and could not do.

I think I could live well on very, very little, provided the infrastructure of society remained in place.   I’d be entirely comfortable with having my gas, water and electricity supplies cut off – we send more electricity to the National Grid than we use anyway.  I’m cool with the idea of foraging and scavenging, and we have a garden full of fruit trees and herbs, we grow veggies too.  I have enough clothes to last me a lifetime, and I know how to make clothes from old sheets and things.  I can sew and spin and cook.  I’m a whizz at lighting fires, and I’m used to washing by hand.  I can make pots and baskets, we can sing and dance and play instruments, I know how to look after newborns and people who are dying.  I have hardly any possessions, and I own nothing that I care about losing.  I’d be happy living in a tiny hut so I could put out my own housefire if I had one, so I wouldn’t need a Fire Brigade.  I’m peaceable and solitary but also potentially dangerous and not very moral, so I think I could get by without the police and the prisons.  I loathe school with a passion so I wouldn’t be sad if the schools closed.  I can never get what I want at the library anyway.  I’d be actively pleased if the supermarkets closed down and all the chain stores.  I’ve grasped how to minimise the chances of getting heart disease and diabetes and cancer and all the other lifestyle illnesses, and how to have a go at making them better if they occur. 

So life without money as described by Mark Boyle seems like a jolly good idea to me.  I like going out for afternoon tea at Bettys and Fortnum and Mason and Waterfalls and what I call The Gandalf (it's called The Randolph really but this is the only way I can remember the name), I like going to the theatre and the cinema – but I wouldn’t be greatly bothered if such things vanished from my life either.  I like my computer and the possibilities it brings me, the information, the ability to earn money, the chance to be inspired and learn from others – but if those possibilities got up and left me, well, I’d just be grateful that I had them for a while.

Provided I had a patch of garden, the means to acquire oats and dried beans and pearl barley, I think I’d have everything I needed to hand.

Those, to my mind, are not the difficult things.  But there are some things I can’t see a way to fix without money.
Suppose, in ten or twenty years time, my uterus prolapses.  How the heck am I meant to fix that without a hospital and a surgeon and an anaesthetist? And how can we train the surgeon who will do that operation without a university and a teaching hospital now?  An operating theatre needs lights and instruments, sterilising facilities, anaesthesia, at the very least.  How does that work without money?

How d’you get spectacles without money?

Social possibilities underwent a radical change in England when the bicycle was invented and became available to the ordinary person.  Sure we could manage without cars, but how are we going to make bikes without money?

And if we all lived in a more primitive way – kept goats, chickens, maybe more horses for transport – wouldn’t we need a vet at some point?  How do we train and equip vets without money?

I am not in favour of a society based on debt and usury, which is what we have now.  Time and again the Bible warns against that, and the church has ignored those warnings.  I see that debt (which is what all our money now is) requires a growth economy, which is inherently unsustainable and will inevitably crash.  But I can’t see how we can sustain any kind of infrastructure without some form of currency.  And without some sort of  infrastructure, a great deal of serious misery and suffering is inevitable – death in childbirth of both mother and child, gangrene and tetanus, and the social evils that arise from small, insular social groupings (persecution of minorities, genetic disorders caused by inbreeding etc).  It is not the idea of death that worries me really – my own or anyone else’s.  Whatever else death does, in some instances it offers a radical solution!  It’s being trapped in a living, suffering body that terrifies me – for myself or for anyone else.  To have the responsibility of care for someone I love, without the means to bring remedy or relief.  No meds.  No emergency services.  No diagnostician.

One might say, in a society without money people (doctor/vet/tradesman) would give their services for free, and in exchange the people would support them with eggs from their hens and apples from the garden.  But that’s not the issue.  How would we get the sick person to the doctor or the doctor to them? Where would we get replacement surgical instruments? How would we manufacture reliable anaesthetics?  We can go back to medieval practice and learn a lot, but even in the Middle Ages, in Ancient Egypt, in the early Hindu civilisations, they relied on currency for the advance of knowledge and expertise.

I’ve thought about this a lot (can you tell?)

I now think the only thing I can do is live as simply and resourcefully and kindly as I can right now, then stop worrying: focus on today and trust in God.  But even simplicity isn’t that simple.  It’s quite complicated working out the next step and the next step and finding the discipline to put it all into practice.

Another thing I’ve been thinking about a lot, is relative and intrinsic worth in the context of personal success.  One of the best books ever written, David Whiteland’s Book of Pages, was remaindered.  By contrast, J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series is what you might call ‘quite good’.  It’s okay, but not excellent.  Yet it succeeded massively.  It hit the bullseye of the zeitgeist, where David Whiteland was too sophisticated in his thinking and too far ahead of his time.  If he tried again now with that book, and had a good enough publicist, it should be fĂȘted all over the world.  Book of Pages should have been a cult book, as big as The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, or The Lord of the Rings.  It deserved to be.  But the estimation of worth is often determined in our society by promotion – you need a platform.  People don’t seem to know something is good until someone they see as a celebrity tells them it is – Oprah Winfrey is a great maker-up of minds.  Nobody knew Eckhart Tolle was one of the wisest men in our generation until she pointed it out.  Success is no measure at all of intrinsic worth.  Why not?  It ought to be.   

Another thing I’ve been thinking about – oh no, wait . . .  that’s probably enough, isn’t it?

Well, I’ll just tell you about a couple of things that made me laugh.  I went to church.  There’s almost always some zany thing that happens at church that keeps coming to mind later and making me laugh.

This time, there were two things.  One was at the Eucharist (I hope you aren’t going to be shocked by this or think I’m irreverent).  The minister, a creative soul, was not satisfied with the words ‘the body of Christ’ in placing the bread into our hands.  However this minister was also afflicted with a certain sibilance in pronunciation, so that ‘th’ came out as ‘s’.  So it came about that I received the host on Sunday morning with the surprising admonition ‘Feed your face on the body of Christ’.   You will be pleased to know that I retained complete decorum.  But we laughed a lot about it once I got home.

The second thing was a child being let loose on the (carefully scripted by an adult) introduction of the hymns.  Thus we were encouraged to work towards the ending of all hat red.

Darn!

 Qui, moi?






(Not complaining.  not criticising.  Not cynical.  Just amused.)


----------------------------------------------------------


A few links for Book of Pages

THREE AVAILABLE ON eBay UK RIGHT NOW - but they are £23.90 + £2.00 p&p.

Quotes here at Good Reads

On Amazon US but more expensive than Amazon UK and only one review, see here.

Good review here - though the reviewer has not picked up on the subtleties and number jokes, or the Zen mind.

David Whiteland's website.

16 comments:

Rebecca said...

So much to chew on in your first observation (and not sure why we "over here" are getting our cues from y'all). I do concur with your final, personal conclusion THAT one.

Re. the second: Yes! Why are we so quick to follow the advice of "celebrities"???

I chuckled with you at the first of the final two and am still trying to figure out the red hat one. But if I never do, the picture of you in yours will be enough to keep me smiling.

Ember said...

:0)

Hi Rebecca - waving!

Not 'red hat' - 'hat red'. That's what the child said. I think what the adult who wrote the notes had in mind may have been 'hatred'.

x

Alice Y. said...

Ah, so good to hear this from you Pen. We might not have the answers yet -- I think God is the one who does -- but I get such a sense of relief that at least you feel like someone who is asking the right questions!

God bless. xx

m said...

OH Pen...this is just precious! My daughter, as you know, is multiple disabled, so doctors and hospitals are very much part of our daily lives...but I do yearn for a more simple life...but then she would not be what she is now. And to be honest Pen, I love her just the way she is :)

Thank you for your insight. m

Ember said...

I feel sure voluntary simplicity is the way to strike the right balance - relying on state provision and consumer society only where we cannot avoid it, and doing as much as we can ourselves. And I think the first task for individuals is surely to get out of personal debt as far and fast as possible. xx

Heidi said...

I think living without money is something some people are able to do because "everybody else" are not living that way. And sometimes I think it's unfair of me to want to withdraw (not in the sense of living without money, but on less and thus contributing less to the welfare state etc.), but then I think about all those people who would definitely not want to live as I do, and it seems more acceptable then ...

Ember said...

Walking lightly on this earth in every way is surely the way to go. x

Pilgrim said...

I think living without debt is a good intermediate goal, for the society at large. Too late for that.
A personal point of action would be to start shifting words from our internal "need list" back to a "want list", where they used to be.
My mother taught us so many things that my homeschooled nieces and nephew have learned, but my formally (public and private) schooled nieces and nephews have not.
Like you, I would not be sorry to see the schools go, and much smaller informal networks for educating spring up.

Pilgrim said...

I got the hat red, and am glad it wasn't the hat aqua. :-)

lettersfromthestreet said...

Well,you have given this a lot of thought. I have too -- but you bring up a couple of points I hadn't considered. Thanks. As much as I favor simplicity, mourn the alienation inherent in industrial society, etc., I'm not a Luddite. I don't think there is a "back" to go back to. The only way is forward and, given human nature, I don't presume that at some utopian time there will be a lot less greed, conflict, etc. I can't help but feel, nonetheless, that a society in which more people were more agrarian, and way less consumerism, would be better for everyone and still retain the improvements (antibiotics, anesthesia, cheap transit, information tech, and so forth) that really do enrich people's lives.

Carol in the USA said...

Thanks for the great morning laughs. Not sure I could have held it together as well as you did on that first one :)

I am so grateful for the internet and my ability to find others of kindred thought and would dearly miss it. It hasn't been that long that it's been widely available but I have so enjoyed learning and communicating this way. Like you, I believe personal simplicity and the ability to live frugally is the way to go. I am still amazed, after living so many years in prosperity, that we (in the US) seem to be in a huge nosedive from which recovery looks daunting.
Again, thank for the chuckle and for sharing your thoughts on how we go forward.

Paula said...

I have thought a lot about living lightly, living off the grid, living locally, etc. It's something that I imagine a lot of folks like you and your readers do. Here are some of the pitfalls I encounter as I follow my thoughts into the drawbacks:

In the United States, we are famous for having the Rugged Individualists who decide to move to the country and rely on only themselves (and their SUVs). Their logic extends up to the point that they decide they would have to protect their property with an arsenal of guns. They don't think about the life-saving technology going away. (Hence the SUVs.)

You went beyond this line of thinking to recognize we would be living without a lot of important, life-saving technology. I've done the same: About 20 years ago, when I was getting a tooth filled, I let my mind wander about in creating a utopian society. One where we lived so locally that we could survive quite happily without having everything shipped in from the next town or next state or next country or next continent. And then I realized that the man working on my teeth would need utensils that simply couldn't be manufactured in every single town. Everything would become prohibitively expensive if we tried to recreate everything so locally. (Right now, I'd just be happy if I could purchase the most ordinary things made somewhere other than China.)

Living without money requires a level of cooperation that would blast us back to the stone age. Money allows us to all live better. We could not have the technology and advancements in health if we didn't have a money-based economy. It simply can't be done.

Meanwhile, let's go back to the man living without money: Living without money means that the person who does this is scavenging out of the dust bins and relying on the charity of others, without adding anything back into the community. (Yeah, that young, able-bodied man part.) He can do that for awhile, but only in a wealthy country is that possible. In a poor country, it would be a devastating way of life. Just ask the people living in a slum on top of the urban garbage dumps. It doesn't mean one can't be happy, but the health of such people is just shocking.

Ember said...

Hi friends. Pilgrim, re the large-scale, international debt, I think the question 'To whom, exactly are we in debt?' needs asking.
The present system by which we operate means that money is created as loans - so the system is intrinsically a form of debt; it's the nature of the case that there will always be more owed than there is to pay it back, because of the means by which it is created. It doesn't have to be that way - that's a straight choice.
getting out of private debt is still a good idea though, even if avoiding public debt seems to be beyond us.

Hi Bruce - yes the compromise you suggest would be my ideal, too.

Hi Carol - yes, the internet is a truly wonderful opportunity, from which we should learn as much as we can. Never has so much help and inspiration been so available to us all.
As to recovery - I think the problem is bigger than we have realised. This is not a temporary dip but a sea change. We have to learn new ways to live. The lighter we are travelling, the more gracefully we can adapt, whatever life may ask of us.

xx


Ember said...

Hi Paula - your comment came in while I was writing my reply to the earlier ones.
Yes to all you say - except I ought just to add that Mark Boyle, like Daniel Suelo, believes in making a contribution; volunteering, helping others etc. His choices are not selfish but I agree with you that, without the continuation of the status quo, his proposed way of living without money would be as stuffed as the lives of those who do depend on money.
Even so, what he is proposing - that we work with the way life is *now*, his brand of freeganism mopping up the excess our society so carelessly throws away, is for these passing years of excess an appropriate response.

Bean said...

Did you watch the 70's tv show, The Survivors? Someone uploaded the entire series onto Youtube so you can watch again if you so desire.
I was around 10 when the show first aired and it really had a big impact on me. I did watch the whole thing on Youtube last year and enjoyed it immensely as an adult.
Anyway the premise of the series is that everyone in England becomes ill and most die. The survivors (hence the title) have to come together and try to survive in this new reality where society as they know it is gone. It helped the survivors that most of the population was killed off this made it easier to survive. Some people who had much needed skills in in the old world were not worth much in the new reality and vice versa. Each little community that slowly formed was made up of people who could all contribute to the good of the group there was no room for slackers. Illness become a huge worry without readily available medical care, a doctor or nurse who survived was invaluable.
Anyway, you the get the gist of the show, it is thought provoking to watch.
I think if we all suddenly were forced to live voluntary simplicity it would be very difficult. Imagine if everyone was scavenging there would be nothing left to scavenge :)
I think of the Amish that live near us, they are very dependent upon the modern world and would find life very difficult without the rest of us. They depend on home builders to hire them to help build homes, the income supports their families, or perhaps they build beautiful cabinets for homes and make a living selling them to non-amish. They need "drivers" to hire to take them places when it is not practical to take a horse and buggy. Amish grocery shop at Walmart, and lots and lots of them do. Amish depend on tourism to sell quilts and "amish" made goods to non-amish visitors. When sick they utilize the hospitals and doctors. Without the income generated from non-amish who are smitten with items if they are "Amish made" there would be a severe shortage of money for basic necessities.
I think simplicity is something very personal, if we lived in a tribal village in the Amazon we might not even be aware that we are living a "simple" life. It is all a matter of perspective. In fact the villager might think we have the simple life because we have so much free time for leisure :)

God created us as people of community, we need each other to thrive and survive. Even the Amazon tribal village dweller is dependent upon his/her immediate community for survival.

Ember said...

I never saw 'The Survivors', Bean, but I do remember it being on.
I think the point you make about being made for community is a very important one. I think this is still so even if an individual is solitary or introverted.
When I come across the end-times types online who advise stockpiling foods and making sure your household has a big garden so you'll be all right when everyone else is not, it always surprises me that they haven't seen how futile that would be - in such a desperate scenario, your neighbours would just loot your home and take your stuff. The only way that works is to take care of everybody: there is no other viable way because, as you said, God made us for community - and God is reality.
xx