Thursday, 21 May 2026

Clothes and going home early

 I've been writing this blog for seventeen years. One of the earliest posts, about Quietness, was written in the April of 2009. 

We had a cat called Mackerel back then. This was her sleeping, on the day I wrote that post.



As the years went by and I wrote down my thoughts, friends drifted through and went their way and came back — people I never physically met, but who journeyed with me in the stories I was writing and chatting in the comments section on my blog posts.

Not all of them are still alive. Some of them went home early. When my daughter Hebe was a little girl at school, if a child in her class was feeling unwell, sometimes they would be allowed to go home early, and she always thought it was worth being ill if that was the outcome. Accordingly, she began to think of dying as going home, and those people who didn't live their full span of years as going home early.

Someone from her life who went home early was her beloved cat Ted, who died just as we went into the pandemic lockdown. I wrote about how he went home early here. This is Ted. He was dearly loved.



The cat Mackerel also died during the years I've been writing this blog, but she didn't go home early — she was ancient. 

And now the cat Clarence has come into our lives, turning up on our windowsill the first we moved into the house where we live now, and staying ever since. 



The first of the Kindred of the Quiet Way to go home early was Deb, who lived in Durham. Then there was Suzan who was in Australia. And most recently Emma, from America. We never sat in the same room, but we knew one another; we were kindred, we were friends. They brought me such encouragement.

I was thinking of them today when a comment came in from Becky, who has also been a fellow-traveller on Kindred of the Quiet Way, and wandered back in again to say hi just this morning. She'd been reading my thoughts about organising belongings and wondered f I had any related thoughts about clothes — in the context of considering simplicity.

And that made me think about Deb and Suzan, because those two each owned only three skirts and three tops; one to wear, one to wash and one in the wardrobe (if I'm remembering correctly). I always admired that level of simplicity, sticking with just those few items of clothing and finding it enough. 

The last week or two I've been turning over thoughts about living simply in my mind again, thinking it's time to prune out what I have, let go of some less successful sandals (fake Birkenstocks with disappointing foot support) and excess skirts that I made but always chose a different one to wear, and duplicate trousers.

And then along came Becky, thinking about downsizing and asking about clothes, and that brought Emma and Deb and Suzan back to my mind, and Ted — all the ones who went home early.

We'll find them again one day, and it will be joyous.


Wednesday, 20 May 2026

Jerusalema

 Jerusalema. Did you love it as much as I did?

The Covid lockdown had so much going on in it, so many vivid moments. I think we all came out the other side different from when we went in.

One of the things I loved about that time was the explosion of videos of people dancing to Jerusalema all around the world.

I think I could listen to that song every day for the rest of my life and never get tired of it.

The Franciscans in Italy...





The Irish police... 



The Czech fire department...




The Elephant Nursery in Zimbabwe...




The Brothers of St John in London...




Kids in Uganda....


After Mass in the Tyrol...


I loved them all.

What a strange time that was, full of sorrow and wonder. 

What Sarah asked about zoning for belongings

 A few days ago I wrote a post called Retrenching, and in the comments to it a conversation developed about managing belongings, where Marie Kondo was mentioned (otherwise known as KonMari). I remarked that I like her principle of zoning — each person in the household having a zone allocated for which they are responsible, so it quickly becomes clear who should be keeping what tidy, and you don't get areas developing that are nobody's responsibility. In that conversation Sarah made the good point that it can be tricky know what to do about the communal areas. She said this:

I haven't quite figured out how to delineate spaces for family members. There are, of course, bedrooms; but my three daughters share one with one closet, one dresser, and one funny kitchen-like cabinet mounted near the ceiling (!). Their items kinda just stew together. As for communal spaces, there's the bathrooms, living room, kitchen, dining area, and garage. The garage is the easiest space to divide as there are a lot of shelves, but that, too, is tricky, because a lot of the items are communal (gardening and repair tools, etc.). How do you organize zones in your home?

I started to reply, but quickly realised my comment would be ludicrously long, as home organisation hasn't been exactly standard in my case, though it has been successful: so that's what this post is about.

The key point for me is that I was blessed to encounter St Francis of Assisi and his emphasis on holy poverty, back in 1972 when I was only fifteen. My family was not rich, and my mother was an absolute star at home décor and household management. She never wanted a job outside the home, so she in effect made a career out of climbing the property ladder during the property boom years of that time. Our homes got grander and grander, and she began to accumulate rental houses as well, steadily progressing, moving house and reinvesting. But in terms of disposable income, we still lived on a shoestring and had very few possessions. By the time I was old enough at fifteen to get paid work on the weekends and evenings and school holidays, I had already discovered St Francis and holy poverty, the power and beauty of what we nowadays call minimalism.

Thus the places where I lived had to be in tip-top condition to be bought and sold in rapid succession (a bit like military families moving in and out of accommodation), and there was no money to accumulate personal belongings, and the insane proliferation of mass-produced objects hadn't happened yet, and even if it had I wouldn't have wanted loads of things because of St Francis.

Much (not all) of the work I did as a girl and young woman was with monks or nuns. In the year between school and university, I lived a few months in a twelve-foot caravan when I was working with some monks in Devon, then in a shared room in the nurses' home with some nursing nuns in Hertfordshire. When I went to university (in York) I quickly became involved with the Roman Catholic chaplaincy and from there part of a live-in student faith community where half a dozen of us moved out of our university rooms into a four-bedroom rented Victorian row house of medium proportions where we all lived together. Space was tight and we used the stairs as the seating for our chapel where we sang the Office, the half-landing being the space for the cantor and reader.

I married when I was twenty and still at university, and lived with my husband for a while in another twelve-foot caravan at the edge of a field of cabbages on a farm, then in the downstairs (no bathroom) of a disused rectory. 

Then, our university courses complete, we moved to Hertfordshire and lived in a barn for a while, then borrowed money to buy a little two-bedroomed Victorian row house down in Hastings, where our first four children were born.

Then we upgraded to a three-bedroomed Victorian row house where our fifth child was born. There we usually had other people living with us — prisoners on weekends out of prison as their release time drew near, a prisoner with nowhere else to go after his release, a boy who needed somewhere to go after release from hospital following a failed suicide attempt, a young man leaving home — that sort of thing.

Meanwhile we were good friends with a Bruderhof community a few miles inland — the Bruderhof are like the Hutterites (in fact they were Hutterites at that time, though they aren't now) — and they all live in allocated family accommodation a bit like military families, and they hold all things in common, so a sort of family life version of monastic holy poverty. Their ways of doing things influenced me a lot.

Like my mother, I was home-based (though I worked various casual jobs at various times), working as a writer and later as a church pastor.

Eventually we moved into church accommodation that went with the churches I pastored, and when my first husband left (in somewhat disastrous circumstances that cause us to lose our home as well) I was left with five still not fledged kids and no family home or income. I made a living working in a shop and as a palliative care assistant and crafting ceremonies and writing, and we re-started our home scattered in a string of tiny apartments near each other. Then I went back into pastoral ministry, and married Bernard and moved into his tiny cottage in the woods, then he died a year or so later and I moved out so his son could have his home; back into a two-roomed apartment shared with one of my daughters. Then I married Tony and moved away from Hastings to Aylesbury. This necessitated leaving my work as a pastor (of six churches at that time), so I earned my living by taking in lodgers, and different family members also lived with us at different times.

Then we moved back to Hastings because I hated being away from my family, and bought yet another Victorian row house (a bigger one, four bedrooms) for Tony and me and three of my daughters.

This last year is the first time ever that I have lived in a normal home (a small three-bedroomed 1930s house), just me and my husband (for size — that's a Smart Car). So I've moved house about ten times since I was a mother, and several times as a young adult before that.


But I have always been what I call the house angel — the person responsible for running the home, allocating the accommodation and organising the domestic space. Except for the year I was married to Bernard. His cottage was pretty much a shrine to his previous wife (I met him when I took her funeral seven years before I married him), and he could allocate me only two drawers and half a cupboard for my personal possessions. During the illness of which he died, one of my daughters came to live with us, moving into a caravan in the garden. The morning he died we moved out to vacate the house for his son, and my Nissan Micra was all we needed to move all the possessions of both of us back into my two-roomed apartment in Hastings.

So my life has been characterised by many moves and ingeniously shared space; all made possible — in fact easy — by owning almost nothing, and habits acquired from monks and nuns and Bruderhof members and St Francis (he lived in a donkey shed until the donkey moved back in). 

Therefore allocation of space has been crucial in my role as house angel, or we'd have lived in a dirty muddle.

This blog post is getting rather long; I'll try to be brief in explaining what we did.

It was important to me that we had no debts and no external storage — no stuff stored in relatives' garages or homes (we ourselves never had a garage), nothing in the attic and sheds (apart from overflow people, usually me) except camping gear and Christmas decorations in the attics and relevant tools in the sheds, no rented storage. What couldn't be neatly and sanely accommodated in our bedrooms and cupboards was sold or given away.

Toys and musical instruments (we had a lot of those) and art/craft materials were kept in boxes, and books on shelves, and I ensured or oversaw that they were all put away at the end of the day. I taught my kids at home for a couple of years when they were young, which imposed further necessity for imaginative management of the space.

In the 3-bed Victorian row house we lived in for most of my daughters' childhood, we built a shed in the garden for an extra bedroom, some of the time my husband and I slept in the attic (a regular attic, no windows, no floorboards, accessed by a stepladder), and we subdivided the large bedroom to make two. We also re-divided the two reception rooms that the previous inhabitants had knocked through into one (as was fashionable at the time) to create accommodation for ex-prisoners or prisoners on leave.

So we did building work to divide the house into zones for privacy, and each person was responsible for ordering their space, and the common areas were small, or sometimes non-existent. For instance, in the two-roomed apartment I shared with various different ones of my daughters, she would have the bed in one room, which had a tiny ensuite bathroom (shared by both of us), while I slept on the floor in the living room, where the kitchen was in a sort of alcove off the living space. And in Bernard's cottage, the only space that wasn't his was my two drawers and half a cupboard.

Therefore nobody could have very much, and everything they did have was neatly stored in boxes and kept in their own rooms. It was my job to strategise how to use the space so everything looked homely and harmonious, there was enough shelving and seating and somewhere for everyone to sleep, enough crockery and cutlery and cooking things, but absolutely nothing in excess because there was nowhere to put it.

At the point our twins came to the stage of coming out of nappies (US diapers), I thought "this is going to be a nightmare" and we changed our carpets for vinyl flooring, including on the stairs. So when we did that, I wrote the names of my five children on the lowest five of the stairs, one on each stair. As the day (or days) went by, anything a child had left out downstairs I put on her stair to be taken up to her bedroom. The rule was that when the stair was problematically cluttered you had to take your stuff up (or before that, ideally).

Saturday was pocket money day, and no one could have her pocket money until her room was tidy.

At Christmas time at our chapel they asked every year for good used toys to give to children with none, so we did an annual cull then.

I regularly reviewed clothes and toys, though never moving anything on without permission. Musical instruments — and we had a piano, guitars, recorders and flutes, a harp, a sitar at one point, music stands and boxes of sheet music, a tuba, a euphonium, a trombone, a bugle, various minor percussion instruments, a violin, a viola and a mandolin — were all stored as neatly as I could manage, either under the bed of the person who played it, or adjacent to the piano or whatever I could come up with. Music stands and scores were kept in stacking boxes beside the piano.

We had no kitchen gadgets (coffee maker, ice-cream maker, mixer, blender, bread-maker, nothing like that), and there was no room for a freezer or tumble-drier or dishwasher because we kept our piano in the kitchen.

I firmly believed that leadership is done by inspiration and example. Our kids knew their parents slept on a mattress on the living room floor or in the attic or the box room, or wherever was the smallest and lowliest available place; they were grateful to have a proper bed and their own place to play and keep their belongings. They never grumbled or asked for anything, and they knew all about the Little Poor Man of Assisi, and about Jesus who couch-surfed his way through Galilee and was born at the Tower of the Flock at Migdal Eder, because there wasn't room in the kataluma at Joseph's relatives' place.

In the house we live in now, I have a room of my own, and items of furniture — a bed and two chests of drawers. I still have almost nothing of my own, and regularly cull what I do have. In my bedroom we keep the prepper pantry and the freezer and the (artificial) Christmas tree, because I have two built-in wardrobes and don't need one of them. I own various pictures and decorative half-moon wall shelves dotted round the house to make it pretty — including this calligraphy.



I try not to accumulate stuff. Having a whole house for just the two of us gives the luxury of more thinking time — for instance I have two folding tables in the garden shed that are only occasionally needed (eg to make an improvised kitchen in the living room if work is needed on the actual kitchen). They are very sturdy and very useful, but most of the time we don't use them at all. In former times I would have given them away, but here there is space to keep them in case someone else in the family needs them. But I wouldn't hesitate to give them away if I meet someone who could do with them. Similarly, we have one or two more chairs than we need, and I'll pass those along when I meet someone who needs them — and I do; the Lord sends people my way who don't have much and need help.

In the house where we lived (shared with my family) before we came here, the communal spaces had only communal things — telly, sofa, chairs, table etc. Our personal things, even towel, shampoo, toothbrush etc, were kept in our own rooms, except my husband who had his own shower room, which he cleaned and managed and everything in it was his. Same here: the sheds are his, and he has a study, and it's up to him to monitor and clean them. He also has stuff still in the shed that was his workshop at our old house, but that's under gradual negotiation between him and my daughters, because what they want to keep and want him to take has been in consideration. But I am always on the case and very frank about telling people that they should respect and consider others in the way they use and allocate space. It's a precious resource, and part of the way we love one another. And, as Toilette Lippe said, "Problems arise when things accumulate".

So that's it, really — the spaces I have managed and the ways I have managed them. I've found that by living in a smaller space than you think you need, and by owning almost nothing, the problem doesn't exactly solve itself but it stays manageable. I brought one other thing to the mix — I am determined, fairly ruthless, and very hard to argue with.

Dang — Clarence the cat is hungry — I'll come back and check this for typos etc later.


Monday, 18 May 2026

Health thoughts

 One of my all-time favourite writers is Oliver Sacks. I'm not sure what his exact designation should be — was he a neurologist or a neurosurgeon? Something of that sort. I think he was a physician, so let's say a neurologist then.

He wrote a series of books about different aspects of neurological disturbance and health, which are so vividly and engagingly written they read like novels. A superb writer, with a compassionate and curious mind.

There's something he said — I noted it down decades ago, and had to dig around to find it — that has always stayed with me. This was with reference to severe mental illness:

I believe that though one can be 'beside oneself' or 'lose oneself' for years on end, the self itself is still present, always present, intact, entire— however withdrawn or buried it may be.

He extends this to physical illness also — though I am fairly persuaded by the view that mental illness is physical illness, as much as the condition of the body can equally be affected by state of mind — saying:

I think the ravages of physical and mental disease are both superficial; that there is something unfathomably deep beyond their reach...

[These two quotations are both taken from the extensive footnote 13 to page 277 of his book Awakenings]

The last five years I've been ill, doctors all puzzled and no help forthcoming, so I've been on a patient quest to restore health through simple and naturopathic means, and had a significant degree of success but never got all the way there (so far; I haven't given up).

Something that interests me about it is that occasionally (it happened this morning) I get a flash of how I used to be when I was well. And when that happens, what becomes apparent is that there's a whole version of me with the illness just pasted on top. It's like drawing back a curtain or a cover. Underneath there is suppleness and vitality and an unquenchable happiness. It's all still there, waiting; I just have to work on lifting away the slime mould of oppression sitting over the top of it.

This also gives me a different insight into death; I presume the logical extension of these thoughts is that at the end of our time here we walk through the doorway into the world of light and, as we go, we drop the cloak of sickness and disability, it just falls from us because it doesn't really belong to us, it was never really part of us — it's circumstantial, not proper to who we really are.

I don't know this, I'm only speculating. but it feels right.

Also this

I have a few other thoughts in my head, but I wanted to share with you this three-hour seamless loop (!) of Aunt Gladys (not my aunt, just everybody's I suppose) singing this marvellous song assuring you that you're going to be OK.

It seems to me that this is what we all need right now!


Tuesday, 12 May 2026

Earlier thoughts abut money and simplicity

 Because of a conversation with my husband this morning, about money and priorities, and how revealing of a person's values is heir expenditure, I was looking for the text of a haiku my daughter Hebe wrote some years ago. This one

I knew I had it on a memory stick somewhere, but then I thought I would have included it in a blog post at some point — so I searched to see, and I had.

But that search took me back to two different posts, one in 2019 and one in 2016, looking at money management and moneyless economy. I've been thinking down that same track again recently, and I thought you might be as well, so here they are.

A post from 2019 about minimalist management of money and resources, and another one from 2016 about minimalism and moneyless living.




Monday, 11 May 2026

About retrenching

Have you read Jane Austen's book Persuasion? Or if you're not an avid reader, have you seen one of the movies made of that story?

If you have, you might remember the bit at the beginning where Sir Walter Elliot considers leaving Kellynch Hall.

In case you don't know this story, I'll explain about the bit I mean.

Sir Walter Elliot, a pretentious English gentleman, presides over a household that has been living beyond its means. They come to a point where the stew has hit the fan, as it were, and necessity to cut back on expenditure becomes not only evident but actually urgent.

Their sensible family friend Lady Russell is on the case — gloriously described as being "of sound rather than quick abilities". She concludes this:

They must retrench; that did not admit of a doubt. But she was very anxious to have it done with the least possible pain to him...

So Lady Russell consults with Sir Walter's daughter Anne (the heroine of the novel), and Anne has some far-reaching cuts in mind. Lady Russell proposes a more diluted way forward, but even her gentler scheme is received with horror:

How Anne's more rigid requisitions might have been taken is of little consequence. Lady Russell's had no success at all: could not be put up with, were not to be borne. 'What! Every comfort of life knocked off! Journeys, London, servants, horses, table, — contractions and restrictions every where. To live no longer with the decencies even of a private gentleman! No, he would sooner quit Kellynch Hall at once, than remain in it on such disgraceful terms.'

Coming back now from Persuasion (it's a good book — I recommend!) to the present day, my guess is that 'retrenching' will be on a lot of people's minds.

From the day I was born right up to the present moment, I have never had a large income. This of itself has been an absolute blessing, because my mother and her mother and her mother were the people who ran their household budgets, and my word, did they know how to make the money stretch!

So I've never had a lot of money, but never did the money I had buy less than it does right now. I am assuming this is also true for you, regardless of your level of income. But with all that's going on in the world, I think we can safely conclude that present circumstances are only the beginning.

This is where retrenching comes in.

Back in 2009 I wrote a book called In Celebration of Simplicity, which was exactly what it says on the tin — about living simply and why it's a good thing. It's out of print now and will remain so, because my editor had a rush of blood to the head and made its layout so complicated that I don't think our self-publishing programme can handle it. But second-hand copies are still around. 

Then ten years after I'd written that book, it dawned on me that I'd overlooked a vital component. Living simply is powerful and effective, but there's a prerequisite (the part Sir Walter Elliot couldn't stomach): what Jane Austen called retrenchment and I've called relinquishment. So I wrote a second book, Relinquishment, about the art of letting go, which — once I'd thought about it — I realised was an essential first step of practicing simplicity.

The thing about retrenchment or relinquishment is that it can't be done fast. People cling tenaciously to their habits and their comforts and their expectations, and detaching oneself from all the nice things one is used to enjoying is hard to do and impossible to do overnight.

Why I'm saying this is to flag up that this may be the season to retrench, to relinquish. As the cost of living goes up like a rocket, prices rise and income shrinks and taxes increase, obviously we have to be able to manage on less — and my experience suggests this can only be done incrementally. As we gradually progress in managing without things we've always had and assumed we always would have, we become more adept at finding alternatives — cabbage not avocado, for example, or a homemade omelette not a store-bought quiche, or a friend round for a cup of tea in the back garden rather than meeting up at a café in town. But it's slow, it's gradual, and what makes it especially hard is that we take for granted what we habitually do, and our expectations have conditioned us; we are at first blind to the possibilities and alternatives.

So I'm thinking that now is the time to start. Even if you think you're already good at it, look again, re-evaluate. Keep a ledger if you don't already, and review your expenditure regularly and often. Take advantage of the many books and YouTube videos that talk about living frugally; even if you know it all anyway, it psychs you up to whatever needs addressing next. Then you will keep ahead of the curve and not be caught out by hard times.

Retrenchment, and therefore relinquishment, I suspect may be the order of the day. And I do recommend Persuasion, whether the book or one of the movies made from it. Excellent story.

Thursday, 7 May 2026

On the bus

 We do have a car — here it is in front of our house. 


It's a nice little car and we both like driving it, but these days we have no reason to go very far or go anywhere very often. I take the car when I go up the hill to visit my family in the evening sometimes, if my body is hurting and I don't want to walk, and every week I take some of our family to the shops that are too far for them to walk, for their groceries. And if we go out in the evening when the buses have thinned out, or go out to one of the villages where public transport is patchy, then we take the car.

But mostly for going to church on Sunday or to the bank, or any other reason to go into Hastings town centre, or up the hill to see our family or get something from the shops nearby, we travel by bus, because we have old people's bus passes, so it's free after 9.30 in the morning.

Yesterday I caught a bus into Hastings. That maybe sounds odd, in that you probably know me as living in Hastings. I do, but like many seaside towns Hastings is a long sprawling place. St Leonards-on-Sea was a seaside holiday resort added on to it in the 1820s by a Victorian architect called James Burton. It grew through the Victorian and Edwardian era, and then in the 1930s when building deregulation gave rise to massive housing development in England, the housing estate where we now live was added to St Leonards in what had been a little country village called Hollington. So we do live in Hastings, but on the northern part of the bit that's St Leonards, and the centre of Hastings down by the sea is a couple of miles away — a bus ride.

I was going to a lunchtime concert. Through the summer these happen every week at the church where I go most Sundays now. It's a donation-only concert, so anyone can go even if they haven't got much (or any) money, and it's in the daytime, which I prefer, and only forty minutes long. These summer lunchtime concerts have a mixture of all kinds of music, but yesterday's was French café songs, very ably performed by two singers and a pianist — delightful.

The bus going into Hastings was almost full, with some people standing, and only a smattering of seats available. But I was lucky; at the point I boarded the bus the seat next to the emergency exit half-way down was empty. That's a good place to sit; it has more leg room, to make space for using the emergency door if need be. So I sat by the window, and as it's a double seat that meant there remained a vacant one next to me. And across the aisle from me the corresponding double seat likewise had someone sitting by the window and an empty aisle seat.

A couple of stops further along, several people got on board, including a small, thin, middle-aged man with a beard, wearing a rucksack and carrying a stick, and accompanied by his carer — who was a big, burly, gentle-looking young man with tattoos.

They came along the aisle past the many occupied seats, the man with the stick going first and saying softly "Not this one. Not this one." Mine was the first possibility of an empty seat, so he sat next to me, saying quietly to himself, "Keep quite still. Don't say a word." His carer took the adjacent seat across the aisle.

I spoke to the man who sat beside me, to tell him I liked his note to self — "Keep quite still. Don't say a word." — and he turned his head very fast and abruptly to look at me. He had bright, shrewd, twinkling eyes. I liked everything about this man. He told me his name is Paul Young, but explained that he was not Paul Young the rock star. He said a little more about Paul Young (the one he wasn't) and then after that our conversation lapsed; but sitting beside someone on a bus takes you within their aura, allowing you to continue to commune with them; and I liked his. 

When their stop came, silently inside my mind I said to him, "Have a good day," and as they got up from their seats his carer looked down and said to me, "Have a good day." So that was interesting. Evidently we were all tuned in, because nobody normally says that to you on a bus.

I hope I meet Paul Young (not the rock star) again one day. He felt like a friend.

As you can see, another friend has come to sit with me now —



— so I guess that's the end of that.

Wednesday, 6 May 2026

The Poor in Spirit

 Do you know the YouTube channel called The Awakened Believer? I find their videos on Bible texts most interesting.

I specially enjoyed this one on a verse from the beatitudes, about how its meaning has morphed in translation through the years.



I also loved this one from further along in the Sermon on the Mount.


And this one about the Lords Prayer.

Saturday, 2 May 2026

Walking through the modern world

 The modern world has a kind of hyperventilating quality that is not conducive to peace.

I don't pay any attention at all to mainstream media news, because it's disappointingly propagandist, and information worth having can't be derived from that source.

I do listen to some informed and intelligent voices, to try and get some kind of map-bearing, a perspective of sorts, to help establish an appropriate direction of travel and see what's coming towards me. It makes everything less bewildering and gives me a chance to ready my own life and circumstances — always useful.

It seems fairly clear that the global patterns are moving at two levels — the one we're all supposed to be occupied watching, with its polarities and tribal antagonisms, and the orchestration behind the scenes that looks to be powerful, large and purposeful, the machinations of the Powers That were. For instance the strange coincidence of oil refineries around the world all being attacked or exploding or otherwise coming to grief at the same time. We ordinary people have no means of joining the dots, but we can be fairly sure it's not intended for our good.

Still, I've come to the conclusion that — large and powerful and heartless though the political machinery may be — it almost, from our point of view, doesn't matter. I don't mean it won't affect us, because it certainly will, but if we have no means of influencing it then it's in effect a distraction.

The last two books in the Hawk & Dove series, the ones I wrote this year, were set in 1326. That was one heck of a year in England. The king and his queen had fallen out. Edward II was a disappointing and unpopular monarch, and most of the country — church, aristocracy, people — backed the queen. Having been out of the country, she invaded and took over. Edward III was only a teenager at the time, but he was eventually set on the throne in place of his father at the beginning of 1327 — and he was an improvement, I gather.

But in reading about all this, what struck me was how bloody and barbaric the whole thing was. The King had various homosexual love affairs, which the queen was happy to ignore until it adversely affected her own interests. Then, after she'd seized power, she had one of his lovers — Henry Despenser — executed. Not beheaded as the man's father was, but raised up on a ladder that they tied him to after the initial partial hanging of being hanged drawn and quartered, and first castrated then disembowelled. The queen sat and had her lunch, watching his sex organs being tossed into a fire and his guts pulled out. After that they cut him up into pieces. King Edward meanwhile was held in captivity and died in mysterious circumstances around the turn of the year. It was rumoured that his death was brought about by having a red hot poker thrust into his rectum.

A similar fate to Henry Despenser's was visited upon the Carthusian monks during Henry VIII's dissolution of the monasteries. The Church of England's inception rests upon those bloody tortures. And those who were not so dispatched were kept in prison, chained upright to the walls, left there to starve. Carthusians. Gentle, good men whose crime was keeping faith with the Roman church and not changing their allegiance.

And further back than that, in Roman times, there was the death of Jesus — and he was one of thousands, the crosses lined the roadway. What a grisly and horrific, cruel way to die. 

But going back to the 1300s, that was a long season of wet summers during which the harvest failed year after year, and in consequence many people died. In the 14th century, the development of root vegetables hadn't happened yet. There was grain, and fruit, and animal products (meat, fish, poultry, eggs, cheese, butter, milk). The animals ate grass, and the vegetable part of the human diet was fruit, spices, herbs and some greens. They ate things like rocket and chervil, onions and garlic. But the garlic and onions weren't as we think of them now — they were more like scallions (salad onions). The leeks were like the three-cornered leek we still have. So the human population and the animal population both relied on grain to see them through the winter — augmented by hay for the cattle, but in the wet summers the hay harvests would also have failed.

I am saying all this because I think it helps us avoid having a doom-ridden disaster mentality about modern times. Yes, there is much to dismay us. Yes, there are global elites who do not wish us well. Yes, the elites want all the power and all the blessings of life for themselves and themselves alone. But the thing is, they always did. Wars are terrifying and destructive and bring no good outcome, but it was always so.

We have deceitful leaders and society riven into factions, but that was always so too. Somehow we have to find a way to thread a pathway of kindness and quietness and practical love through all this violence and antagonism. if we don't, we'll go mad.

At the same time as all the strife and division, the oppression and domination and hardship, in every century there have been good and quiet folk, caring for the land and for their families, developing skills and making music and writing poetry, worshipping God and taking delight in the seasons of the light as the year turns in the natural world. People who spin and sew, who know how to build a fire on the hearth, who know how to birth a lamb and hoe a garden.

In modern times, that maybe means there are people who can drive a car and manage the online banking and household accounts, people who can cook a Sunday lunch and know which shops have the best bargains. I hope also that, as part of our worship of God and reverence for his Spirit in creation, we are paying attention to getting our groceries from farm shops or box schemes that re-use packaging, and sell us food that has been kindly and organically and regeneratively produced. None of this glyphosate and factory farming.

And I hope that we still find ways to sew or knit our own clothes and create our own art and write our own poetry, that we still play instruments and sing together. Let's not relinquish it all to the machines.

The books I've written this year are intended to speak into the times we're living through, to help us remember the essentials of thriving as human beings even in daunting and challenging circumstances: and those essentials — in every age and place — are gentleness and understanding, the willingness to talk things through and forgive one another when something goes wrong, the grace to help each other and lift one another up. There isn't the world that we have to live in: we are made in the image of God so we each make our own world, we each have the power to create it and sustain it and redeem it. We bring it into being by our life choices, and we strengthen it by practice that deepens into habit; we redeem it by starting again when we go astray.

And it was always so.

I am a huge fan of the work of Thomas Cranmer, who was responsible for the Book of Common Prayer. Somehow his collects always put into words for me what my heart wants to pray. He, too, got tangled up in the power struggles of political elites, and despite desperate attempts to comply with their conflicting and antagonistic requirements, he spent two years in prison and in the end was burned at the stake in Oxford, holding first into the flames the hand with which he had signed his recantations.

Here is his collect for the fourth Sunday after Trinity, from the Book of Common Prayer:

O God, the protector of all that trust in thee, without whom nothing is strong, nothing is holy: Increase and multiply upon us thy mercy; that, thou being our ruler and guide, we may so pass through things temporal, that we finally lose not the things eternal. Grant this, O heavenly Father, for Jesus Christ’s sake our Lord. Amen.

So may it be.