I’ve been reading the book I bought of Joyce Grenfell’s letters to her mother, dipping into it here and there.
Its contents span the years between 1932 and 1944. I am always intrigued to notice how — without our really being aware of it or applying any particular intentionality — our attitudes change with the passing of time, and we end up with quite different perspectives on life from our original outlook and understanding. Nowhere has this been more starkly true than in our evaluations concerning sex and racial prejudice — both of which have undergone a revolution in recent times, and so much more ground still to cover.
I’ve been thinking a lot about self-reliance, and its place in our lives — to what extent we may be responsible for our wellbeing, and how much we depend on each other.
Internet algorithms mean the articles that appear under our noses reflect and relate to what we have already considered — which encourages us to swim along a deepening and narrowing strait, and can give us the false impression that “everybody thinks” or “the fact of the matter is”, when in reality the opinions and possibilities are more diverse.
Probably because of my leftist political inclinations, quite a lot drifts my way about The Authorities, usually in the vein of how woefully inadequate they are, falling down on the job and not doing enough for us.
In my Joyce Grenfell browsing, I came across a letter from August 1937 — so, 84 years ago (!) — about a car crash that happened near Joyce’s home.
It’s quite a long section to type up, so I photographed it for you — can you read it okay? I think if you click on the photo it should come up bigger.
So many points of change (since 1937) struck me when I read it!
- Almost nowhere is dark now (a few places still are).
- Very few people own or wear dressing gowns.
- Most people, if they heard a car crash, would immediately phone the emergency services — probably not first run out in their dressing gowns to see what had happened.
- It is highly unlikely modern people would pick the car up, right it, check it over, and pronounce it okay to drive.
- Most people would insist on a doctor seeing the people who’d been in the crash.
- The prospect of a modern Harry offering a ride in his car to two girls he’d never met, and their accepting the offer, is startling.
- That the man got back in his car and drove it away is astonishing to us now.
- At no point did anybody think of calling the police.
There is so much that’s different, and all around issues of trust, what is likely/acceptable in public spaces, and what people think it reasonable to do for themselves without involving The Authorities.
In the years I grew up I could easily imagining this playing out, but not now.
We have come to rely very heavily on The Authorities. Where I live, most people won’t even shovel the pavement outside their house clear of snow; they sit inside complaining bitterly because the men from the Borough Council haven’t been to do it. They complain about the weeds growing at the edge of the road and blocking the pathways, but rarely does it occur to them to weed the section outside their home. Sometimes. Not often.
This morning over coffee, our Alice was recounting an incident she had read about in America — I don’t know where, but one of the states where it gets very cold. She said a whole family had perished in a power outage. With no electricity to their home they grew desperately cold, and had the idea to sit in their car, in the garage, letting the engine run to warm them up.
I’m sure that immediately triggers your inner uh-oh mechanism — and yes, they all died of carbon monoxide poisoning, which was an absolute tragedy.
But the news item included information about a relative who lived some distance away — an uncle, I think — who had become alarmed when he failed to contact them after repeated attempts. He called the police, who said they’d go round and check. They did. They knocked on the door, got no answer and went away.
Apparently the uncle called repeatedly and the police responded more than once, but every time only knocked and left.
Apart from it being so sad, the thing that struck me especially was the take-away from this scenario offered by the news item.
What it focused on (according to our Alice, I haven’t come across it myself) was a conclusion that this was an example of racism in the police. That they hadn’t taken more decisive action because the family was black.
Certainly racism of one kind and another does seem to be a harsh and destructive feature of every society the world over, and indeed not least in America; so it is most likely reasonable and shrewd to suppose the police who called at the house might have been racist — because most of us do seem to be so. Regrettably. May God have mercy on us and transform us.
But it did cross my mind that there was another potential take-away from the scenario, never considered or discussed, which was this: families do well to be prepared for emergencies.
It doesn’t take much. For my part, I refuse to live anywhere that does not have a working fireplace, because I have lived through some passages of considerable poverty, and can well envisage needing to keep warm by burning scrounged packaging and foraged (discarded) wood. I also insist on installing a water butt and locating a spring, and investing in a very good water filter, just in case our water is ever cut off. Wherever I have lived, even if all I had was shared outside space or a hard standing meant for a car, I have always planted something to eat, and found out where wild things to eat grow. I am not a prepper as such, but I keep a small stash of basic things like oats and lentils in case there are food shortages or I run out of money — and my garden has as many fruit trees growing in it as the space permits.
Now, I recognise that many people don’t have a garden or the chance to live in a home with a fireplace, and may be rental tenants who have no permission to instal water butts. I come of a family whose immediate response to every suggestion is a bustling stampede of objections, so I can well imagine any you have in mind.
But the point is not the specifics, rather, the principle.
If you live in Minnesota (or anywhere that gets similarly cold), in a house with no wood stove or open fire and depend entirely on electricity for heat and light, then before the winter draws in, get yourself:
- Matches
- Some bio-gel chafing fuel tablets you can burn safely indoors
- A stovetop kettle and a Trangia (or similar) stove to stand it on
- A hot water bottle (each)
- A wool hat (each)
- Blankets
- A thermos flask
- A water carrier of some kind
- High-energy long-shelf-life food
- LED camping lights (keep the batteries charged or have spares)
- A bucket toilet (and bokashi bran to neutralise pathogens) in case the house water freezes
Be sure that you have the water carrier kept full indoors in the worst of the weather, so that if the power goes out in deep cold you have water that won’t be frozen. Keep that for drinking, fetch in snow to melt for the hot water bottle. Fill the hot water bottles (use the chafing fuel tabs to boil the kettle), and the thermos. Sit in one room together, wrapped in blankets, with hot water bottles, for warmth. Eat the high-calorie food.
Always keep phones charged so that if you get caught by a power outage, you have a charged battery to start.
DO NOT sit in a car in a closed garage with the engine running. Do not run or burn anything that will compete with you for oxygen, for any significant length of time, in a closed room. Warm yourself — don’t heat the space, heat the person — and maintain an air flow. Wear a hat, because your body will sacrifice all warmth to keep your brain temperature stable, so you stress the body less if you insulate your head. Keep any places warm where arteries rise to the skin surface (wrists, neck, ankles).
(I appreciate that it costs money to buy a stash of emergency provisions like that, but it also costs money to buy and maintain a car and fuel it.)
If you are ever in a similar position to that poor family in America, keep in mind that your uncle in a neighbouring state may call the police and they will come to help you; and if you have such a stash of supplies, they might find you alive.
Of course we must combat racism and speak up against instances of it we come across — especially if the racial group we belong to has the advantage of privilege.
But whatever colour we are, and however poor we may be, it is always worth seizing whatever chances come our way, to make up a box under the bed for the day when the unforeseen emergency happens.
As Joyce Grenfell’s experience demonstrates, you don’t always need to rely on The Authorities. As that tragedy of the family in America demonstrates, The Authorities aren’t always much use even if you do rely on them.
We must do our best to work for a society in which everyone is cared for and no one left behind; but until we’ve got it (and even after we have), a few low-key preparations in case of emergency never go amiss.
7 comments:
Have a few preps in place. We mayn't like the food choices if necessary but food is there. I try to keep a small supply of tissues and tp and some fuel. The other day after having a rummage in one of the pantries I found I need the following:
1. A new butane stove and canisters as ours has died.
2. I need to buy a fan that runs on batteries as I don't cope well with out heat.
3. The pump on the water tank needs fixing.
4. A good water filter would be a good addition.
5. We are coming into storm season and I have only 12 water bottles left. I cannot use the tank water as it is not potable.
I think we have become lazy and pass things on to others.
Your list is interesting — it shows that emergency supplies are very region-specific. I'd never have thought of a fan. However, though our summers are never anything like as hot as yours, people here have been very foolish in replacing their traditional sash windows (two vertical halves that slide up and down) for PVC replacement windows that just have one opening part at the top (or none at all, or open as casement windows). The sash windows are ingenious because they promote air circulation, and here in the UK that's generally all we need to keep the rooms cool in summer — especially since our Victorian houses are for the most part fairly damp! It's costing us an absolute fortune to gradually put back the sash windows that the previous residents took out and threw away.
On potable water, I highly recommend the Berkey filters; they make rainwater potable. They are very expensive but then last ages.
Sash windows are great. Hot air rises and the circulation is wonderful. Sometimes I would like something like a wood stove but they are polluting and not really necessary here. But staying cook is the most difficult thing. When I was in England I felt the damp more than the cold. My one and only trip to England took place in December/January. That suited the school holidays.
Also, re emergencies. I attended a talk by a fire officer once who advised that all householders should have an evacuation procedure in place and that even the youngest child should know it if possible. He said there were many cases of finding children in wardrobes etc because they were waiting for people to come for them, when a well rehearsed exit strategy - carried out quickly would save lives.
On open fires. We are in an apartment now, which is my first home without an open fire for many years. However, next door seem to get very cold and their heat is on a lot and we benefit! May they never move :-)
Heheh — the people next door are probably wondering why their heating bills have gone up . . .
What you said about an exit strategy is brilliant. I will pass that on to Buzzfloyd to think about for her children. Thank you.
I have a 3-day bug-out bag all set even with cat food and a disposable litter box. I never understood the huge problem of folks left on roofs after Katrina. I mean, if you live below sea level, wouldn't it be prudent to get a canoe or a row boat for the price of a month's cable/internet? But no, no. And here they are in the next massive hurricane.... If I were Queen of the World, people living below sea level would be REQUIRED to have some type of boat, but that's just me, I guess.
And I have to cast doubt on the well-being service call being true. That rings of "Jimmy's World" (Washington Post) that won its lying author a Pulitzer, while being totally and utterly FAKE. (I refuse to put her name in print. She got enough attention for transgressing her profession.) Having a cop in my immediate family, I hear the inside story of how those are supposed to work. And they don't just wander away and refuse service on repeated calls. A call for service lawfully has to be performed EVERY time, unless the person calling is a known and does this all the time to willfully harass somebody. Then they go by and talk to THEM, as well. I don't question Alice, but the media outlet reporting such. (And let's face it: The same people who sit in a closed garage with the engine running are the same ones who try to drive their sedans cross water-filled low-lying roads. Some people have room-temp IQs and there aren't enough nannies to keep them from themselves.)
Hi Jenna
What you say about living below sea level strikes a chord with me. I live in the coast, and though I love the idea of being right near the shore, I also know the sea levels are rising and the people who live along the shore from already have problems with their basements filling with water when the tides are unusually high. I also noticed, travelling on the bus along the seafront when roadworks are being undertaken, that under the skin of tarmac (blacktop) there is just tight-packed sand. So, much as I love the sea, I have always chosen to live a mile or so inland and uphill!
Also what you say about responders to emergency call rings true — in our household we enjoy some of the TV programmes about emergency services and RSPCA and lifeboat services etc, and yes, I've noticed they are always particular about making actual face-to-face contact unless it's clearly a nuisance call or for some other reason not to be taken seriously.
Post a Comment